Nick Coghlan added the comment:
I expect whatever message we use will become a Stack Overflow question in
fairly short order, so "good enough" is almost certainly good enough here, and
I'm massively overthinking the problem :)
However, combining my last suggestion with a variant of Martin's would give us:
"Cannot reuse already awaited coroutine"
The generic "reuse" both eliminated the repetition of "await", and also gets us
away from worrying about exactly what the caller was doing.
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue25887>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
