poostenr added the comment:
Eric,
I just tried your examples.
The loop count is 100x more, but the results are about a factor 10 off.
Test1:
My results:
C:\Data>python -m timeit -s 'x=4' '",{0}".format(x)'
100000000 loops, best of 3: 0.0116 usec per loop
Eric's results:
$ python -m timeit -s 'x=4' '",{0}".format(x)'
1000000 loops, best of 3: 0.182 usec per loop
Test2:
My results:
C:\Data>python -m timeit -s 'x=4' '"\'{0}\',".format(x)'
100000000 loops, best of 3: 0.0122 usec per loop
Eric's results:
$ python -m timeit -s 'x=4' '"'\''{0}'\'',".format(x)'
1000000 loops, best of 3: 0.205 usec per loop
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue26118>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
