Stefan Krah added the comment: In my experience it is very hard to get stable benchmark results with Python. Even long running benchmarks on an empty machine vary:
wget http://www.bytereef.org/software/mpdecimal/benchmarks/telco.py wget http://speleotrove.com/decimal/expon180-1e6b.zip unzip expon180-1e6b.zip taskset -c 0 ./python telco.py full $ taskset -c 0 ./python telco.py full Control totals: Actual ['1004737.58', '57628.30', '25042.17'] Expected ['1004737.58', '57628.30', '25042.17'] Elapsed time: 7.16255 $ taskset -c 0 ./python telco.py full Control totals: Actual ['1004737.58', '57628.30', '25042.17'] Expected ['1004737.58', '57628.30', '25042.17'] Elapsed time: 6.982884 $ taskset -c 0 ./python telco.py full Control totals: Actual ['1004737.58', '57628.30', '25042.17'] Expected ['1004737.58', '57628.30', '25042.17'] Elapsed time: 7.095349000000001 $ taskset -c 0 ./python telco.py full Control totals: Actual ['1004737.58', '57628.30', '25042.17'] Expected ['1004737.58', '57628.30', '25042.17'] ---------- nosy: +skrah _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue26275> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
