STINNER Victor added the comment: I prefer fastint_alt.patch design, it's simpler. I added a comment on the review.
My numbers, best of 5 timeit runs: $ ./python -m timeit -s "x = 12345" -- "x*2; x*2; x*2; x*2; x*2; x*2; x*2; x*2; x*2; x*2; " * original: 299 ns * fastint2.patch: 282 ns (-17 ns, -6%) * fastint_alt.patch: 267 ns (-32 ns, -11%) ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue21955> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
