STINNER Victor added the comment:
(Oops, I attached the wrong patch, fixed in patch v2.)
Quick & dirty micro-benchmark:
Original:
$ ./python -m timeit -s 'lst=list("hello")' 'lst[2]'
10000000 loops, best of 3: 0.0261 usec per loop
Patched:
$ ./python -m timeit -s 'lst=list("hello")' 'lst[2]'
10000000 loops, best of 3: 0.0186 usec per loop
----------
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file41834/binary_subscr-2.patch
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue26301>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
