Terry J. Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Rationale for banning f(*,**k): it could represent a bug (intended bare name(s) omitted) that should be flagged, a lack of clear understanding of the redundancy, or a somewhat unPythonic stylistic preference for useless redundancy. I consider the first the most likely in practice, though I also did not see the redundancy at first. Guido has used the 'likely a bug' rationale for other design decisions.
---------- nosy: +tjreedy _______________________________________ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue2613> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
