Martin Panter added the comment:

FWIW I already invented this :) as written in Issue 22247. Although I think I 
only used it once or twice in my own personal librarie(s). So it’s a nice sign 
that we came up with the same @public name and usage.

I’m not a fan of hacks depending on the calling frame, and I prefer APIs that 
“only do one thing”. So I am okay with accepting an object and work off its 
__name__ and __module__, but not okay with also accepting a string and guessing 
what module it was defined in.

----------
nosy: +martin.panter

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue26632>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to