Georg Brandl added the comment: You didn't test your examples:
>>> [] == False False False is not equal to the "empty value" of any other type than other numeric types. (This is mostly because of how booleans were originally introduced to Python.) "is false", on the other hand, is the conventional shorthand for `bool(x) == False`. ---------- nosy: +georg.brandl resolution: -> not a bug status: open -> closed _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue26847> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
