Emanuel Barry added the comment: Functionally, both versions are equivalent, but one is a class and the other is not. From PEP 399:
"Technical details of the VM providing the accelerated code are allowed to differ as necessary, e.g., a class being a `type` when implemented in C." It clearly states that it's an implementation detail. I've been beaten! However, the next paragraph also says this: "Acting as a drop-in replacement also dictates that no public API be provided in accelerated code that does not exist in the pure Python code." I think this contradicts itself, since IMO an object being a type is part of the public API (but obviously this thought isn't universal). Whatever happens with the pure Python implementation, shouldn't the PEP be clarified on that point? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue27137> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
