Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: I'm also -1 on the patch and think it is the wrong solution.
Efforts should probably be directed at hooking the output of the interactive interpreter. We already have code that suppresses None return values and assigns results to "_". That same code can also add custom interactive reporting for a few, known iterators. _______________________________________ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue2610> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
