Colm Buckley added the comment: @haypo - I concur with all of your comments. I didn't have a strong opinion on whether to modify getrandom_works; your proposal looks fine to me (and will give consistent behavior over the lifetime of the process).
Thanks all for your help with this issue; much appreciated. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue26839> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
