New submission from Vedran Čačić:
Look:
>>> complex('1-0j')
(1-0j)
>>> 1-0j
(1+0j)
Yes, I understand what's going on, and it's probably wrong / too much to expect
1-0j to work properly, but I'd really like the complex from string constructor
to be consistent with that. Even more because (of course):
>>> import ast
>>> ast.literal_eval('1-0j')
(1+0j)
----------
messages: 269013
nosy: Vedran.Čačić
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: Complex with negative zero imaginary part
type: behavior
versions: Python 3.6
_______________________________________
Python tracker <[email protected]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue27363>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
