Yury Selivanov added the comment: > However, IMO, it's useful to be able to accept a connection outside of an > asyncio event loop and then hand the loop the connected socket.
Looks like what you're asking for is a way to wrap existing socket object into a (transport, protocol) pair. I'm -1 to add this new semantics to loop.create_connection, as I think it will complicate it too much. However, we can consider adding something like loop.wrap_socket(protocol_factory, sock) -> Transport ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue27392> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
