Jean Brouwers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Right on! With errno = 0; in between both calls:
-Inf 33 Inf 0 /Jean On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Mark Dickinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Mark Dickinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Jean Brouwers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> result is different for 32- and 64-bit >> >> > cc -xtarget=native log_inf.c -lm ; a.out >> -Inf 33 >> Inf 33 >> > > That 33 for the second log call may just be the propagated errno value > from the first call. Could you try setting errno = 0 before each of the > printf > calls? I'd expect that log(HUGE_VAL) doesn't set errno at all. > > Mark > > Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file10722/unnamed > > _______________________________________ > Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > <http://bugs.python.org/issue3167> > _______________________________________ _______________________________________ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue3167> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
