R. David Murray added the comment: The current wording is, IMO, better than the suggested wording, especially if you don't want to be "teaching stuff". The current wording is a specification of the method's behavior. I really don't know what you could replace "approximate" with that would improve it without having to get into a description of the behavior of a threaded program.
It seems like you are wanting us to document that the function will return an accurate size if the program is single threaded, but I don't think we want to do that, because that is not part of the specification of the method. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue27624> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com