R. David Murray added the comment:

The current wording is, IMO, better than the suggested wording, especially if 
you don't want to be "teaching stuff".  The current wording is a specification 
of the method's behavior.  I really don't know what you could replace 
"approximate" with that would improve it without having to get into a 
description of the behavior of a threaded program.

It seems like you are wanting us to document that the function will return an 
accurate size if the program is single threaded, but I don't think we want to 
do that, because that is not part of the specification of the method.

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue27624>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to