Martin Panter added the comment: Now I am confused. In <https://bugs.python.org/issue27643#msg271773> we have
[Me] If your compiler does not support “signed short” bitfields, maybe we just have to accept that ctypes supports it even though the compiler doesn’t, and skip the test. [Michael] Looks like this may be the approach: as signed int, signed short give the same message - it seems that xlc (and maybe Sun C) does not accept "short" as a bitfield type. Apparently XLC doesn’t accept signed short bitfields for Michael, but does for Eric. What’s going on? Maybe different versions? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue27643> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
