Mark Dickinson added the comment: > I think the round() function should explicitly check for None and replace it > with zero
That would be a change in behaviour: `round(x)` is not the same as `round(x, 0)`. For most types, `round(x)` returns an `int`, while `round(x, 0)` returns something of the same type as `x`. Instead, I think we should add the check for `None` to `int`s `__round__` implementation. >>> round(1.3, 0) 1.0 >>> round(1.3) 1 >>> round(1.3, None) 1 ---------- nosy: +mark.dickinson _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue27936> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
