STINNER Victor added the comment: > I'd also like to request that you reword this dismissive line in the > performance package's readme: (...)
Please report issues of the performance module on its own bug tracker: https://github.com/python/performance Can you please propose a new description? You might even create a pull request ;-) Note: I'm not sure that we should keep pybench, this benchmark really looks unreliable. But I should still try at least to use the same number of iterations for all worker child processes. Currently the calibration is done in each child process. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue15369> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
