John J Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: * The patch looks like it will break code that uses .header_items(), which is not acceptable.
* The patch to the docs seems to muddy the waters even further (than the current slightly murky state) about whether and why .headers is to be preferred over the methods, or vice-versa. I think .headers should remain undocumented, for the reason stated by the doctest that failed with Hans-Peter's original patch. The best course of action is debatable, but the patch is a regression in this respect, so should not be committed as-is. _______________________________________ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue2275> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
