Nick Edds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: I believe the problem was that in the case of this fix, rather than using set_prefix to give the new node the same prefix as before, new.prefix = was used. Here is the one line fix which preserves the prefix in the example given.
---------- keywords: +patch nosy: +nedds Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file10935/fix_import.diff _______________________________________ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue3334> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
