Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: > Having said all that, perhaps it would be reasonable to tolerate a missing > flush() method, and not treat this as an error.
In all cases the flush() method is called unconditionally. I think it can be considered as mandatory part of the writer protocol. ---------- nosy: +serhiy.storchaka _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue29130> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
