New submission from anonymous2017: Details here: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/41708609/unfair-scheduling-bad-lock-optimization-in-asyncio-event-loop
Essentially there should be a `yield` before this line otherwise a coroutine that only acquires and releases a lock will never yield to other coroutines. ---------- components: asyncio messages: 285688 nosy: anonymous2017, gvanrossum, yselivanov priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: asyncio.Lock.acquire() does not always yield type: behavior versions: Python 3.6 _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue29303> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
