STINNER Victor added the comment: Victor: "I plan to run a benchmark when all my patches to reduce the stack consumption will be ready."
msg285200 of issue #28870: "I also ran the reliable performance benchmark suite with LTO+PGO. There is no significant performance change on these benchmarks (...)" less_stack.patch: -#define _PY_FASTCALL_SMALL_STACK 5 +#define _PY_FASTCALL_SMALL_STACK 3 With the issue #28870, reducing _PY_FASTCALL_SMALL_STACK value is no more needed. Larger _PY_FASTCALL_SMALL_STACK means better performances, so I prefer to keep the value 5 (arguments). The main change, inline call_function(), was merged, so I close the issue. ---------- resolution: -> fixed status: open -> closed _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue29227> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
