Maximilian Blochberger added the comment: Okay, I see, thanks for the hint. That worked perfectly – I found `asyncio.sslproto._SSLPipe` very useful for that purpose.
I personally consider the behaviour of `ssl.SSLContext.wrap_socket()` unexpected and would raise an exception if that method call is tried on an instance of `ssl.SSLSocket`. But as this would be a change that could lead to backwards compatibility issues (if developers depend on that behaviour) this is probably not a good idea. I think that the documentation for `ssl.SSLContext.wrap_socket()` has this behaviour to avoid future confusion – including a hint to make use of `ssl.SSLContext.wrap_bio()` instead. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue29394> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
