Roger Upole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: If that were the case, it wouldn't need to call PyType_Ready for tp_base either. From stepping thru the code, there are several places in the interpreter core that PyType_Ready is called for types whose tp_base has not been initialized yet.
_______________________________________ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue3453> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
