Paul Moore added the comment: No (see the doc link I referenced) - paths are absolute, or relative to the _pth file. So "." means "in the same place as the pth file".
I don't think there's a way with _pth files to get the "add the location of the executed script to the front of sys.path" behaviour. It's not really a good idea for an embedded interpreter (which is the _pth file intended use case) as it makes it a bit too easy to run code from unexpected locations. In an embedded application, you could of course add sys.path entries in your C code. Maybe WinPython could do that too? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue29578> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
