New submission from Tom Krauss: Consider the following simple class that provides a "__complex__" method.
class C(object): def __init__(self, x): self.x = x def __complex__(self): return self.x x=C(-0j) PYTHON 2.7.13 >>> x.x -0j >>> complex(x) 0j PYTHON 3.6 >>> x.x (-0-0j) >>> complex(x) (-0+0j) ---------- messages: 288177 nosy: Tom Krauss priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: complex() on object with __complex__ function loses sign of zero imaginary part type: behavior versions: Python 2.7, Python 3.6 _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue29602> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com