Antoine Pitrou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Selon Benjamin Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Benjamin Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: > > It seems that as with the quadratic binary buffered reading, the best > solution is the list of bytes which should be especially helped by your > bytes joining optimization.
I don't really know. The logic is quite different (and harder to get right) than in BufferedReader. I might try to write a list-of-bytes version and do some timings, but it's not trivial... I should first compare against the current version. Also, an advantage of using a fixed-size bytearray is that it more closely mimicks what will have to be written for an efficient C implementation. _______________________________________ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue3476> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
