Mark Dickinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Toned down note in docs (at Raymond's request) in r65366.
While I'd really like to see an lsum-based version go in instead, I think it's too close to the release to make this change right now. There was also originally some talk of a complex math version. What do people think about this? Personally, I suspect that the use cases would be few and far between, and anyone who *really* needs a complex high- precision sum can just apply math.fsum to real and imaginary parts. (This is easier now that x.imag and x.real make sense for integers as well as floats.) _______________________________________ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue2819> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
