Antoine Pitrou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Hi,
Selon "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I don't think the proposed patch (file11012) makes it thread-safe, and I > believe you cannot get it thread-safe without using thread synchronization. I should have precised that in the context of this issue, "thread-safe" does not mean "produces perfectly correct output" but simply "does not raise exceptions when using the same buffered object from two different threads". The former would be preferable but is not required, IMHO, for a buffered IO library; the latter is much more critical because as Amaury points out, you otherwise get exceptions when printing e.g. debut output from multiple threads. _______________________________________ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue3476> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
