Antoine Pitrou added the comment: This will obviously break some existing code which passes a function returning true to Timer. I concur with Raymond: I don't think this is a good idea. Also, the Timer class itself is a rather simplistic answer to the problem of scheduling callbacks in the future (it uses a dedicated thread per callback, which is extremely wasteful). You'll find better solutions in more modern toolkits, such as asyncio; or you can easily write your own logic yourself.
---------- nosy: +tim.peters _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue29569> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
