Nick Coghlan added the comment: Raymond, in the review comments on https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/156 Xiang noted that the current apparently duplicated iterable isn't entirely redundant:
- the first reference is to the term "iterable" - the second reference is to the parameter name "*iterable*" "Return a string which is the concatenation of the strings in the :term:`iterable` *iterable*." So if we're going to drop one of them, it should probably be the link to the term, rather than the parameter name: "Return a string which is the concatenation of the strings in *iterable*." Does that sound reasonable to you? ---------- nosy: +ncoghlan, xiang.zhang _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue22702> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
