Matt Giuca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: So I assumed.
In that case, why is there a "fromhex"? (Was that put in there before the notion of transform/untransform?) As I've been saying, it's weird to have a fromhex but not a tohex. Anyway, assuming we go to 3.1 and add transform/untransform, I suppose fromhex will remain for backwards, and tohex will not be needed. So I guess this issue is closed. _______________________________________ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue3532> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
