Trent Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: I was thinking about this on the way home last night and concluded that my last suggestion (s/0.0.0.0/127.0.0.1/) is a terrible one as well. I'd be happy with a mention in the documentation (for now) stating that if you listen on '0.0.0.0', Listener._address won't be a connectable end-point (and you'll have to explicitly connect to 127.0.0.1, for example).
As for the original issue, Jesse I'm +1 on your connection_v2.patch. _______________________________________ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue3270> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
