Steve Barnes added the comment: @terry.reedy - Very good points and I like the shortness of -0 note that there is already an accepted change to allow -x.y-64 to specifically require the 64 bit versions so we don't need the complex logic to distinguish cases where -x.y will run 32 bit because there is no 64 bit verses -x.y will run 64 bit and -x.y-32 will run 32 bit so I haven't implemented that complex logic.
I have put a tab between the run flag and the path as I find that is easier to detect than some number of spaces. Found that I needed to move the test for -0 nearer the top as 0 is a potentially valid version specifier, (isdigit). Also modified the "not found" message to mention -0 as an option for discovery. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue30362> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
