Antoine Pitrou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Selon STINNER Victor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > So if we consider that RLock is fast enough (see my C version of RLokc > in #3001), we can use RLock instead of Lock to avoid this issue. Here > is a patch to use RLock and also including an unit test of this issue.
I tried your test and it seems to lock when using the Python implementation of RLock, but perhaps it's precisely because the implementation is in Python. Also, your RLock implementation has to be finished before going further ;) (see my comments in #3001) _______________________________________ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue3618> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
