STINNER Victor added the comment: It seems like the root issue was fixed by myself in the bpo-30320. Sorry Martin, I forgot this issue and so forgot to review your patch.
But it seems like we took a similar approach: using signal.pthread_sigmask() seems to be the only right way to write a *reliable* test for sigwaitinfo() ;-) ---------- resolution: -> duplicate stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed superseder: -> test_eintr.test_sigwaitinfo(): race condition on AMD64 FreeBSD 10.x Shared 3.6 _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue25868> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
