Erik Bray added the comment: >> Or we could steal a bit in the opcode encoding or something.
> That seems like a very reasonable and easy-to-implement solution. It > would > generalize this check: > https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/e82cf8675bacd7a03de508ed11865fc2701dcef5/Python/ceval.c#L1067-L1071 Interesting; I didn't notice that bit before. It seems like that does at least try to guarantee that a signal can't interrupt between: lock.acquire() try: ... which previously I assumed we couldn't make any guarantees about. But CPython at least does, or tries to. It would be good to generalize that. ---------- nosy: +erik.bray _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue29988> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
