STINNER Victor added the comment: Alexander: "Sorry for being late to the discussion, but please allow me to add a -1 vote."
While I agree that seconds=28747 is not perfect, IMHO "datetime.timedelta(seconds=28747)" is an enhancement over "datetime.timedelta(0, 28747)". Can't we make small enhanements step by step, rather than each time try to redesign datetime? ;-) (Yeah, datetime is now perfect, but well, it's now widely used and part of the stdlib!) ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue30302> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
