Segev Finer added the comment: The only warnings that remain are:
1. The one from gcmodule.c due to dtrace, which is handled in PR 2852. 2. The peephole warnings which I'm not sure about. Are overflows possible there or not? That is, if there are already internal caps that prevent them. If they are possible, it might require a larger change to support EXTENDED_ARG in some places. i.e. can the consts table really grow larger than `unsigned int` or can a jump target be large enough to overflow? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue9566> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
