Raymond Hettinger added the comment: -0
The code block was originally intended to just be a table of patterns, not meant to be executed sequentially. It followed the traditional presentation order (__getitem__, __setitem__, followed by __delitem__). If we do change this, then the subsequent "k in d" example should also be changed to "'x' in d" because k isn't defined. ---------- assignee: docs@python -> rhettinger nosy: +rhettinger priority: normal -> low resolution: -> not a bug _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue31075> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
