Nick Coghlan added the comment: The condition we (mostly Serhiy) came up with for the check is actually kinda neat, since it's based on the value of the LHS and is hard to trigger accidentally:
``` >>> printf = print >>> print = 10 >>> print >> 1 5 >>> printf >> 1 Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for >>: 'builtin_function_or_method' and 'int'. Did you mean "print(<message>, file=<output_stream>)" ``` Anyway, I'll put together a PR that combines both the original patch and the follow up fix to add the missing question mark. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue31232> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
