Benjamin Peterson added the comment: On Thu, Sep 7, 2017, at 01:17, INADA Naoki wrote: > > INADA Naoki added the comment: > > w_ref() depends on refcnt already. > I don't think removing *_INTERN opcode makes PYC reproducible. > https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/1f06a680de465be0c24a78ea3b610053955daa99/Python/marshal.c#L269-L271
I know—we're going to have to do something about that, too. In practice, though, the interning behavior seems to be a bigger reproducibility problem. > I think "intern one string, then share it 10 times" is faster than > "share one string 10 times, then intern each of 10 references". We end up interning each reference individually currently. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue31377> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
