Amaury Forgeot d'Arc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: > Amaury, if you decide to go forward with this, please clean-up the > patches to eliminate common subexpressions. I already considered this, but generated machine code was identical, so I chose the more readable code.
> Wonder if there is an alternate solution that keeps the next slot > filled with something that raises an Attribute error. That's an interesting idea, and not difficult to implement, see attached patch. The penalty here is an extra comparison in PyIter_Check(). And no change in the event loop... Armin's crashers now correctly raise a TypeError (and the final patch should convert them as unit tests) Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file11317/next-nevernull.patch _______________________________________ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue3720> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
