Raymond Hettinger added the comment: I think the existing code conveys the author's message better than the proposed revision. The example isn't about efficiency; rather, it is about comparing several alternative formulations with this one being the weakest of the lost. For emphasizing that point and not getting lost in a made-up example, the a[1] and b[1] style is more effective.
That's for the suggestion but I don't think it is a win. ---------- nosy: +rhettinger resolution: -> rejected stage: -> resolved status: open -> closed _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue31575> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
