Safihre <safi...@sabnzbd.org> added the comment:
Very good question!
5000 times via imp.load_dynamic:
yEnc C New took 5870 ms
yEnc C New took 5878 ms
yEnc C New took 5835 ms
5000 times via "pip: having the .pyd in site-packages"
yEnc C New took 6489 ms
yEnc C New took 6369 ms
yEnc C New took 6390 ms
Difference ~450 ms
10000 times via imp.load_dynamic:
yEnc C New took 11775 ms
yEnc C New took 11720 ms
yEnc C New took 11695 ms
10000 times via "pip: having the .pyd in site-packages"
yEnc C New took 12338 ms
yEnc C New took 12281 ms
yEnc C New took 12345 ms
Difference ~500 ms
10000 times via imp.load_dynamic:
yEnc C New took 23431 ms
yEnc C New took 23406 ms
yEnc C New took 23283 ms
10000 times via "pip: having the .pyd in site-packages"
yEnc C New took 24401 ms
yEnc C New took 24177 ms
yEnc C New took 24482 ms
Difference ~1100 ms
So not very linearly scaling but still increasing. Odd.
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue31555>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
