Yury Selivanov <yseliva...@gmail.com> added the comment: Note, that this will not be backported to 3.6, as it behaves in a slightly incompatible way. I consider this patch as an enhancement that makes 'asyncio.wait_for' semantics easier to reason about and more practical.
---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue31556> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
