Gregory P. Smith <g...@krypto.org> added the comment: I'd stick with ValueError in that case as well. if someone dislikes the valueerrors because they _want_ to use an invalid one, they can file a bug and we'll reconsider only if they have a meaningful use case.
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 9:36 AM Serhiy Storchaka <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote: > > Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka+cpyt...@gmail.com> added the comment: > > What to do with values outside of the valid range (2**4 to 2**31 for > Blowfish, 1000 to 999999999 for SHA*). Raise ValueError, OverflowError, or > bound it, or just generate an invalid salt and allow crypt() to handle it? > > ---------- > nosy: +haypo, pitrou > > _______________________________________ > Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> > <https://bugs.python.org/issue31702> > _______________________________________ > ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue31702> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
