David Antonini <davidanton...@hotmail.com> added the comment:

Does the Unicode documentation currently conform to that convention, or does it 
require editing? 

It appears to me that a lot of cases where reference to "Unicode object" is 
currently capitalised (most of them, in fact) may need to be modified. 
However, it would seem that there is a grey area in making a distinction 
between reference to the unicode type as implemented in Python and reference to 
the standard as a descriptor of the format of an object? The way I read there a 
lot of the cases are in essence a reference to both.

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue31873>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to