David Decotigny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Thank you Jesse. When I read this passage, I thought naively that a timeout raised in a get() would not be harmful: that somehow the whole get() request would be aborted. But now I realize that it would make things rather complicated and dangerous: the data would get dropped, and will never be recovered by subsequent get(). So thank you for the hint, and leave the things as they are, it's better.
_______________________________________ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue3789> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
